Toronto - The idea that there’s safety in numbers was a major driver behind the #MeToo movement, which encouraged people who had been targets of sexual misconduct to come forward.
While there have been many heated debates about why people who have experienced abuse don’t report, a pair of economists used their academic discipline’s tools to dispassionately explain why underreporting is at its highest when misconduct is widespread, and why awareness-raising campaigns like #MeToo can help.
“There are real economic reasons why people don’t come forward,” says Ing-Haw Cheng, an associate professor of finance at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management who co-authored the research with Alice Hsiaw of Brandeis University.
The pair built a model of the decision to report using game theory, which applies mathematics to represent situations where the outcome of each individual’s decision is affected by everybody else’s choices.
In an environment where sexual misconduct by one or more individuals is an open secret, those who have been their targets face uncertainty over whether others will come forward. If one person chooses to report misconduct, they do not know if their information will be backed by other reports, or if it will be an outlier, weakening their credibility and making them vulnerable to reprisals. In the language of game theory, the complainant who sticks their neck out to report faces a “first mover disadvantage,” with significant potential costs.
Uncertainty over whether others will come forward can be so strong enough that no one will report even when misconduct is widespread, creating a 'culture of silence.'Ing-Haw Cheng, Associate Professo, University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management
"Uncertainty over whether others will come forward can be so strong enough that no one will report even when misconduct is widespread, creating a 'culture of silence',” says Prof. Cheng.
Reporting improves when individuals are aware that other reports have been made, when problematic behavior is penalized, or when people who have been targeted by sexual misconduct receive damage awards, such as through a lawsuit, the model shows.
However, it also shows that movements like #MeToo can have unintended consequences, something Prof. Cheng says are unavoidable. As awareness of sexual misconduct rises, some managers choose not to act as mentors to junior employees. If those managers tend to misconduct, it reduces the number of incidents and the number of reports, leading once again to reluctance to report. If the managers who shy away from mentoring behave ethically, junior employees lose out by not having access to good mentors.
Some organizations attempt to deal with the uncertainty hurdle through a “holding tank” system where misconduct reports are received and held confidentially, but only acted on once there are multiple complaints for an individual. However, the researchers found that the approach does not always help because complainants may again be unsure whether their report will lead to action.
The findings are useful for understanding how to overcome the culture of silence that prevents people from speaking up when they see behavior that runs counter to a group or organization’s rules, ethics, or values.
“A model in economics provides a chain of logic that rests on a set of assumptions,” says Prof. Cheng. “We can use this as a basis for a sensible conversation on an emotionally charged topic.”
The paper appears in the November issue of American Economic Journal: Microeconomics.
Bringing together high-impact faculty research and thought leadership on one searchable platform, the new Rotman Insights Hub offers articles, podcasts, opinions, books, and videos representing the latest in management thinking and providing insights into the key issues facing business and society. (NJ/Newswise)