The number of stores selling alcohol in a neighborhood is linked to cases of child abuse and neglect in the same area, a new study suggests.
A study in Sacramento, California, found that having one more off-premises alcohol outlet – those selling alcohol to be consumed elsewhere – in a census tract was related to 13.5% more substantiated cases of child abuse and neglect in that area in a year and 10.5% entries into foster care.
That was after taking into account a variety of other factors that could impact child maltreatment numbers in the neighborhood.
The results show the importance of alcohol availability in creating conditions that may lead to child abuse, said Bridget Freisthler, lead author of the study and professor of social work at The Ohio State University.
“The relationship between the alcohol environment and child abuse and neglect is complex,” Freisthler said.
“Individual interventions to reduce substance use will not completely solve the problem without addressing the issue of alcohol supply.”
The study was published online recently in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research.
The study explored alcohol use and availability and child abuse and neglect in 326 census block groups in Sacramento over three time points (1999, 2001 and 2003).
Freisthler said that she and her colleagues used this older data because it is very difficult to get data this detailed on a neighborhood level. She said that she believes the relationships found in the study would still hold true today.
The researchers used a concept called “market potential,” which is the total possible demand for a good – in this case alcohol – in a defined area.
“Market potentials are related to the number of bars, restaurants and off-premises alcohol outlets in a neighborhood,” Freisthler said.
“Market potentials for alcohol use have not been assessed in a way that would allow us to understand how they might be associated with alcohol-related problems, such as child abuse and neglect.”
The researchers used measures of child abuse and neglect from child and protective services in Sacramento County. The focus in this study was on parents aged 18-29 because younger parents are most likely to be involved with child protective services.
In addition, alcohol use patterns were estimated using surveys done of Sacramento residents asking about their alcohol use.
Outlets selling alcohol were counted using official state alcohol license data.
The results showed that a 1% higher per capita volume of alcohol consumed in a neighborhood was related to 3.2% more children entering foster care due to alcohol-related concerns.
Freisthler noted that having children enter foster care is a high threshold for determining that children are endangered by their parents’ alcohol use. That suggests that reducing the total volume of alcohol among 18- to 29-year-olds should be the goal.
“Strategies that reduce drinking, even among those who drink at lower levels, may reduce alcohol-related foster care entries,” she said.
One important way to do that would be to make alcohol less easily available in neighborhoods.
“What happens is that these stores that sell alcohol are placed into neighborhoods where, for example, they have more young people who also tend to drink more,” Freisthler said.
“It perpetuates a cycle in which a population, young adults, that tends to drink more is given easier access to alcohol, which leads to more drinking. And the end result is more child maltreatment.”
The study found that the presence of a store selling alcohol – a measure of alcohol supply – had a link to child abuse and neglect even after controlling for the alcohol market potential of 18- to 29-year-olds living in the neighborhood.
“This suggests that the location of an off-premises outlet within a neighborhood may impact child maltreatment outside of the alcohol consumed by those who live there,” Freisthler said.
“We have to pay more attention to how the supply and availability of alcohol has an impact on child maltreatment if we want to make a real difference.” (AK/NW)
