Metabolic health (normal blood pressure, blood sugar and cholesterol levels, among other factors) influences the effectiveness of influenza vaccinations. Vaccination is known to be less effective in people with obesity compared to those with a healthier body mass index (BMI), but St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital scientists have found it is not obesity itself, but instead metabolic dysfunction, which makes the difference. In a study published today in Nature Microbiology, the researchers found switching obese mice to a healthy diet before flu vaccination, but not after, completely protected the models from a lethal dose of flu, despite BMI.
“We found that the vaccines worked effectively if at the time of vaccination an animal is metabolically healthy,” said corresponding author Stacey Schultz-Cherry, PhD, St. Jude Department of Host-Microbe Interactions and Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response co-director. “And the opposite was also true: Regardless of what the mice looked like on the outside, if they had metabolic dysfunction, the vaccines did not work as well.”
Prior research has shown that when exposed to influenza virus, even after vaccination, 100% of obese mice succumbed to disease. Contrary to the scientists’ original expectations, when mice who were vaccinated while obese returned to a healthy weight, outcomes did not improve. These now outwardly healthy mice still all succumbed to disease when exposed to the real virus. Only switching to a healthy diet four weeks before vaccination improved survival, with drastic effect, despite high BMI.
We were excited to see this effect because mice with obesity are so susceptible to severe disease and succumbing to the infection. Getting 100% survival with the vaccine where we had only seen 0% survival was impressive.
Stacey Schultz-Cherry, corresponding author, PhD, St. Jude Department of Host-Microbe Interactions and Center of Excellence for Influenza Research
The improved survival suggests the researchers have discovered a greater underlying principle determining influenza vaccine efficacy.
Metabolic dysfunction hinders the immune system
While studying how metabolic function influences influenza vaccine responses, the scientists found that poor metabolic health causes immune system dysfunction. T cells, the primary immune cells involved in anti-viral responses, failed to act in animals that had been in an unhealthy metabolic state at the time of vaccination, even during later viral exposure. Even when the animals ate a healthy diet after vaccination and maintained a normal BMI, the anti-flu T cells were “frozen” in that dysfunctional state.
However, a healthy diet before vaccination improved T-cell function, which resulted in a robust anti-flu response during later exposure.
The T cells were better able to do their job in the metabolically healthy mice at the time of vaccination. It wasn’t a matter of the numbers of them or the types of them. It was their functional activity. There were plenty of them in the lungs, not working. The healthy diet switched them from not working to functioning properly, but only if the switch occurred before vaccination.
Stacey Schultz-Cherry, corresponding author, PhD, St. Jude Department of Host-Microbe Interactions and Center of Excellence for Influenza Research
The earlier healthy diet also improved inflammation. Pro-inflammatory cytokines are upregulated in obese animals. Schultz-Cherry’s team found that models also returned to a lower basal cytokine level when switched to a healthy diet before vaccination.
A healthy diet lowered some of the systemic meta-inflammation in these animals, and they regained some of the epithelial innate immune responses. We started seeing better signaling of things like interferons, which we know is problematic in obesity and in general saw the immune system starting to function the way that it should.
Stacey Schultz-Cherry, corresponding author, PhD, St. Jude Department of Host-Microbe Interactions and Center of Excellence for Influenza Research
Authors and funding
The study’s co-first authors are Rebekah Honce, formerly of St. Jude, and Ana Vazquez-Pagan, formerly of the St. Jude Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences.
The study’s other authors are R. Chris Skinner, University of Vermont, Brandi Livingston, Alexandra Mandarano, Benjamin Wilander, Sean Cherry, Virginia Hargest, Bridgett Sharp, Pamela Brigleb, Ericka Kirkpatrick Roubidoux, Lee-Ann Van de Velde, Maureen McGargill and Paul Thomas, St. Jude.
The study was supported by grants and contracts from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN27220140006C, 75N93019C00052, 75N93021C00016, F31AI161986, R01 AI140766-03 and 32AI106700-07) and ALSAC, the fundraising and awareness organization of St. Jude.
(Newswise/KS)
